This workshop is designed to elucidate the ethical consequence of the changes in the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) including the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) as a result of the progressive blurring of the internal/external borders and policy objectives. Within this overall objective, the workshop examines the value assumptions underlying traditional CFSP/ESDP objectives including SSR, rule of law and peace building more broadly; and contrasts these assumptions with the value premises underlying JHA that touch on CFSP (particularly counter-terrorism and border management) and that underline the increasing blurring between internal and external security objectives of EU external relations. In addition to a conceptual stock taking, the workshop also discusses the consequences of these potentially conflicting objectives in the field.
The challenge of civil-military relations but also field experiences from the EU’s missions in Bosnia (EUPM), Kosovo (EULEX) and Georgia (EUMM) serve as examples of the consequences of conflicting values within specific policies; and of how policies designed for external interventions (ESDP) engage in internal reform, thereby blurring the internal/external border that formally separates these two objectives.
Program outline:
11:15 - 11:30 Arrival of participants
11:30 -13:00
Panel 1: Values
Chair: J. Peter Burgess (PRIO/IES)
Values in CFSP/ESDP – towards a conceptual approach (Prof. Dr. Eva Gross, IES)
The EU and the rule of law (Dr. Isabelle Ioannides, VU Amsterdam)
Values in JHA (Dr. Xiana Barros, EUI Florence)
13:00 – 14:00 Lunch
14:00 – 15:30
Panel 2: Implementation
Chair: Eva Gross (IES)
SSR and Development (Dr. Ursula Schroeder, FU Berlin)
The challenge of civil-military relations (Prof. Susan Penksa, Westmont /IES)
Experiences from the field: the case of EUPM (Mr. Tobias Flessenkemper, EUPM)
15:30 End of Seminar
Confirmed contributing experts include: